Court-ordered psychiatric evaluations under Iowa Code 812.3, commonly referred to as competency evaluations, are designed to help courts determine whether an individual is able to understand the legal process and participate meaningfully in their defense. In most cases, these evaluations can be completed as scheduled. However, there are situations where an evaluation cannot be finished or where the available information is too limited to reach a clear opinion.
When this happens, it does not necessarily mean that anyone has done something wrong. Competency evaluations involve real-time clinical assessment, and there are times when circumstances make it difficult to obtain the information needed to answer the court’s questions.
One situation that can affect an evaluation is non-participation. Individuals have the right to decide how much information they wish to share during an evaluation, and some individuals choose not to participate in the interview process. When an individual declines to answer questions or refuses the evaluation entirely, the evaluator may have limited information available to form an opinion.
Acute mental health symptoms can also affect the evaluation process. Individuals experiencing significant psychiatric symptoms may have difficulty participating in an interview or providing reliable information. In some cases, symptoms may need to stabilize before an evaluation can be completed in a meaningful way, which is where restoration services under Iowa Code 812.6 might come into play.
Limited background information can be another factor. Iowa Code 812.3 evaluations primarily address an individual’s current functioning and can still be completed with minimal records when necessary. However, when both participation and records are limited, the evaluator may not have enough information to reach a reliable conclusion.
In some situations, the most appropriate recommendation may be to attempt the interview again at a later time or in a different setting. Courts recognize that circumstances can change, and this flexibility is sometimes sufficient to gather the required information and allow services to move forward successfully.
At 1st Choice Competency Evaluations, our goal is to provide clear and well-supported evaluations for the court whenever possible. When an evaluation cannot be completed, we actively work with courts and attorneys to identify the next steps so that cases can continue to move forward.

